Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY v. NINESTAR IMAGE TECH LIMITED, 4:14-cv-04473-HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150225a65 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND THE PARTIES TO FILE JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("Plaintiff") filed its Complaint in this action on October 6, 2014 (Doc. No. 1); WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation entered by the Court on February 2, 2015, the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is currently March 5, 2015 (Doc. No. 18); WHEREAS, pursuant to the same sti
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND THE PARTIES TO FILE JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("Plaintiff") filed its Complaint in this action on October 6, 2014 (Doc. No. 1);

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation entered by the Court on February 2, 2015, the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is currently March 5, 2015 (Doc. No. 18);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the same stipulation entered by the Court on February 2, 2015, the parties' joint case management statement was previously due to be filed on April 16, 2015, which was seven days prior to the initial management conference previously scheduled for April 23, 2015 (Doc. No. 18);

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2015, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., and the deadline for filing the joint case management statement was reset to March 2, 2015; and

WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaging in discussions to explore amicable resolution of this matter.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, that the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint and the deadline for the parties to file the joint case management statement is extended to April 6, 2015.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the parties' stipulation submitted pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the Court hereby grants the stipulated request to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint, and for the parties to file the joint case management statement, to April 6, 2015.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer