Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mobile-Plan-It v. Facebook Inc., C 14-1709 RS. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150226809 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY PRE-MARKMAN CASE SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and as supported by the Declaration of Erin E. Pritchard filed herewith, Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") and Plaintiff Mobile-Plan-It ("Mobile-Plan-It") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, a claim construction hearing in this matter is currently set for over five months from now on July 22, 2015, and because there is a currently pending
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY PRE-MARKMAN CASE SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and as supported by the Declaration of Erin E. Pritchard filed herewith, Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") and Plaintiff Mobile-Plan-It ("Mobile-Plan-It") hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, a claim construction hearing in this matter is currently set for over five months from now on July 22, 2015, and because there is a currently pending motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101, the parties mutually agree to extend the pre-Markman hearing case schedule in order to currently save time and expense for the parties;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiff Mobile-Plan-It and Defendant Facebook mutually agree to the following case schedule prior to the claim construction hearing set for July 22, 2015: • April 15, 2015 Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Pat. L.R. 4-5(a)) • April 22, 2015 Exchange Initial Privilege Logs • April 29, 2015 Defendant's Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Pat LR. 4-5(b)) • May 6, 2015 Plaintiff's Reply Claim Construction Brief (Pat. L.R. 4.5(c))

The proposed time modification will not delay the schedule for the case, including the Markman Claim Construction hearing scheduled for July 22, 2015.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer