DOE v. HARRIS, 3:12-CV-05713-TEH. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150316a39
Visitors: 22
Filed: Mar. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2015
Summary: Stipulated motion to continue Case Management Conference by one week and [Proposed] Order THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . 1. On January 11, 2013, this Court granted a preliminary injunction in this matter prohibiting Defendant from enforcing part of a 2012 initiative statute that would have required that persons convicted of certain sex-related offenses to provide information about their Internet identifiers and Internet service providers to the government. Dkt. 78 (1/11/2013)
Summary: Stipulated motion to continue Case Management Conference by one week and [Proposed] Order THELTON E. HENDERSON , District Judge . 1. On January 11, 2013, this Court granted a preliminary injunction in this matter prohibiting Defendant from enforcing part of a 2012 initiative statute that would have required that persons convicted of certain sex-related offenses to provide information about their Internet identifiers and Internet service providers to the government. Dkt. 78 (1/11/2013)...
More
Stipulated motion to continue Case Management Conference by one week and [Proposed] Order
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
1. On January 11, 2013, this Court granted a preliminary injunction in this matter prohibiting Defendant from enforcing part of a 2012 initiative statute that would have required that persons convicted of certain sex-related offenses to provide information about their Internet identifiers and Internet service providers to the government. Dkt. 78 (1/11/2013).
2. After Defendant and Intervenors appealed, this Court stayed the matter pending appeal as requested by all parties. Dkt. 100 (2/25/2013).
3. On November 18 of last year, the Ninth Circuit affirmed this Court's grant of a preliminary injunction and remanded the matter to this Court for further proceedings. Dkt. 105; Doe v. Harris, 772 F.3d 563 (9th Cir. 2014).
4. As soon as the time for filing a petition of certiorari expired, the parties began discussing how they intended to proceed with this litigation in this Court.
5. On March 2, this Court set a Case Management Conference for March 30, 2015, at 1:30 PM. Dkt. 110.
6. Lead counsel for Plaintiffs is scheduled to be on vacation that day.
7. Plaintiffs therefore request that this Court continue the Case Management Conference one week, to April 6, 2015.
8. Defendant and Interveners stipulate to this continuance.
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED:
The parties request that this Court continue the Case Management Conference currently set for March 30 until April 6, 2015, at 1:30 PM, in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco, with a Case Management Statement due on March 30. March 12, 2015.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
