SMITH v. ZIMMER U.S., INC., C 14-0651 PJH. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150320c18
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . Defendants having asserted that defendant Zimmer U.S., Inc., should be dismissed from the action because it is not a proper defendant, and the court having on two occasions set a deadline for plaintiff to notify the court as to the status of Zimmer U.S., Inc., or to dismiss Zimmer U.S., Inc., and plaintiff having on both occasions failed to comply with the court's order or otherwise respond, the court finds that plaintiff's claims against defenda
Summary: ORDER PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . Defendants having asserted that defendant Zimmer U.S., Inc., should be dismissed from the action because it is not a proper defendant, and the court having on two occasions set a deadline for plaintiff to notify the court as to the status of Zimmer U.S., Inc., or to dismiss Zimmer U.S., Inc., and plaintiff having on both occasions failed to comply with the court's order or otherwise respond, the court finds that plaintiff's claims against defendan..
More
ORDER
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendants having asserted that defendant Zimmer U.S., Inc., should be dismissed from the action because it is not a proper defendant, and the court having on two occasions set a deadline for plaintiff to notify the court as to the status of Zimmer U.S., Inc., or to dismiss Zimmer U.S., Inc., and plaintiff having on both occasions failed to comply with the court's order or otherwise respond, the court finds that plaintiff's claims against defendant Zimmer U.S., Inc. must be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
