Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nelson v. Hartford, 13-CV-04196-CRB. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150324b28 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , Senior District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiff Dessie Nelson, Defendant and Third-Party Complainant Hartford Life Insurance Company (erroneously sued as "The Hartford"), Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Claimant City of Oakland, and Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Defendant Juliana James (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, and respectfully ask the Court to
More

STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER

COMES NOW Plaintiff Dessie Nelson, Defendant and Third-Party Complainant Hartford Life Insurance Company (erroneously sued as "The Hartford"), Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Claimant City of Oakland, and Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Defendant Juliana James (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, and respectfully ask the Court to continue the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for April 3, 2015, for another forty-five (45) days. The Parties believe that good cause permits the Court to continue the conference. The Parties have informally agreed to settle all claims and cross-claims alleged in this lawsuit. The terms of the agreements have already been agreed upon by the Parties and their counsel. The Parties need, however, additional time to: 1) execute the final settlement agreement documents; 2) obtain approval from City of Oakland's City Council; and 3) effectuate the disbursement of settlement moneys. The Parties believe they can resolve these pending issues within 60 days and hope to submit a stipulation for dismissal within that time period. A case management conference at this time would prove unhelpful for both the Parties and the Court in facilitating the resolution of this proceeding. Accordingly, the parties ask the Court to order that the April 3 conference be continued to May 22, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Now before the Court is the Parties request to continue the Case Management Conference for forty-five (45) days. The parties submitted a joint stipulation, appearing above, which showed good cause exists to continue the case management conference, so that the Parties may finalize the terms of their respective settlement agreements. Having read and considered the arguments submitted by the Parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The April 3, 2015 Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED to May 22, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 6. All associated deadlines, including the submittal of a joint case management conference, shall accord with the new conference date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer