GOOD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. AIRWATCH, LLC, C-12-05827 PSG. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150325973
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2015
Summary: JOINT NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANT'S LETTER BRIEFS (DKT. NOS. 222 AND 223) PAUL S. GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. (collectively "Good"), and Defendant AirWatch, LLC ("AirWatch") (all three collectively the "Parties") file this joint notice withdrawing Dkt. Nos. 222 and 223. On March 11, 2015 the Parties filed their letter briefs concerning the additional depositions of Dr. Hugh Smith and Roy Weinstei
Summary: JOINT NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANT'S LETTER BRIEFS (DKT. NOS. 222 AND 223) PAUL S. GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. (collectively "Good"), and Defendant AirWatch, LLC ("AirWatch") (all three collectively the "Parties") file this joint notice withdrawing Dkt. Nos. 222 and 223. On March 11, 2015 the Parties filed their letter briefs concerning the additional depositions of Dr. Hugh Smith and Roy Weinstein..
More
JOINT NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANT'S LETTER BRIEFS (DKT. NOS. 222 AND 223)
PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. (collectively "Good"), and Defendant AirWatch, LLC ("AirWatch") (all three collectively the "Parties") file this joint notice withdrawing Dkt. Nos. 222 and 223. On March 11, 2015 the Parties filed their letter briefs concerning the additional depositions of Dr. Hugh Smith and Roy Weinstein. In the spirit of compromise and to further avoid burdening the Court, the parties have reached an agreement resolving their dispute. Accordingly the Parties request withdrawal of their letter briefs.
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' JOINT NOTICE, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
