ROMERO v. ELLERY, 12-cv-01084-WHO (NJV). (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150326a92
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2015
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on February 20, 2015 at Pelican Bay State Prison, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Michael Romero Pro Se () Warden or warden's representative (X) Office of the California Attorney
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on February 20, 2015 at Pelican Bay State Prison, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Michael Romero Pro Se () Warden or warden's representative (X) Office of the California Attorney ..
More
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING
NANDOR J. VADAS, Magistrate Judge.
A settlement conference was held on February 20, 2015 at Pelican Bay State Prison, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below:
(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:
(X) Plaintiff, Michael Romero Pro Se
() Warden or warden's representative
(X) Office of the California Attorney General, Donn Robert Duncan II
(X) Other: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation representative, Patricia Lee
(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear: _____________________________________________________________________
(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:
() The case has been completely settled. The parties agree that a proposed stipulated order for dismissal of this case will be filed with the Court on ________________.
() The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet attached remain for this Court to resolve.
(X) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
