Filed: Mar. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. 3161 ET. SEQ RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, and the above-captioned defendants (Adefendants@), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. At the last court proceeding on February 3, 2015, the above-captioned matter was continued to March 31, 2015 at 2:30 p.m. and the time from Februar
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. 3161 ET. SEQ RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, and the above-captioned defendants (Adefendants@), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. At the last court proceeding on February 3, 2015, the above-captioned matter was continued to March 31, 2015 at 2:30 p.m. and the time from February..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 ET. SEQ
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
The United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, and the above-captioned defendants (Adefendants@), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. At the last court proceeding on February 3, 2015, the above-captioned matter was continued to March 31, 2015 at 2:30 p.m. and the time from February 3, 2015 through March 31, 2015 was excluded under the Speedy Trial Act on the basis of effective preparation of counsel under 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
2. Since the last appearance, the government has produced voluminous discovery to the assigned discovery coordinator who needs more time to provide copies to all of the defense lawyers.
The defense lawyers will then need time to review that discovery. Thus, the parties stipulate and agree that this matter should be continued to June 9, 2015 at 2:30 p.m., and that the failure to grant such a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The parties further stipulate and agree that the time from March 31, 2015 through June 9, 2015, should be excluded on the basis that the ends of justice are served by taking such action which outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and for effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
ORDER
Upon the parties' stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned matter shall be continued to June 9, 2015, at 2:30 p.m. and that the time from March 31, 2015 through June 9, 2015, shall be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The Court finds that (A) failure to grant the continuance would unreasonably deny the defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence; and (B) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
