Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hendricks v. Starkist Co., 4:13-cv-00729-HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150331a77 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff Patrick Hendricks ("Plaintiff") and Defendant StarKist Co. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation. The parties stipulate that briefing on Plaintiff's motion for sanctions, filed March 26, 2015, shall proceed as follows: 1. StarKist's opposition shall be filed by April 10, 2015. 2.
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Plaintiff Patrick Hendricks ("Plaintiff") and Defendant StarKist Co. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation.

The parties stipulate that briefing on Plaintiff's motion for sanctions, filed March 26, 2015, shall proceed as follows:

1. StarKist's opposition shall be filed by April 10, 2015.

2. Plaintiff's reply shall be filed by April 14, 2015.

3. The motion shall be heard on April 16, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15-18th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer