BENNETT v. LEAD INFO STREAM INC., 15-mc-80088-JSC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150403666
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 1 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is non-party Quinstreet Media, Inc.'s motion to quash a subpoena that Plaintiff Raoul Bennett issued in a civil action (the "Action") now pending in the Southern District of California. (Dkt. No. 1.) The subpoena commands Quinstreet's appearance at a deposition and requires Quinstreet to produce confidential documents relating to its business. ( Id. at 2.) Quinstreet contends that the subpoena mus
Summary: ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 1 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is non-party Quinstreet Media, Inc.'s motion to quash a subpoena that Plaintiff Raoul Bennett issued in a civil action (the "Action") now pending in the Southern District of California. (Dkt. No. 1.) The subpoena commands Quinstreet's appearance at a deposition and requires Quinstreet to produce confidential documents relating to its business. ( Id. at 2.) Quinstreet contends that the subpoena must..
More
ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 1
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is non-party Quinstreet Media, Inc.'s motion to quash a subpoena that Plaintiff Raoul Bennett issued in a civil action (the "Action") now pending in the Southern District of California. (Dkt. No. 1.) The subpoena commands Quinstreet's appearance at a deposition and requires Quinstreet to produce confidential documents relating to its business. (Id. at 2.) Quinstreet contends that the subpoena must be quashed because it seeks discovery of information unrelated to issues in the Action. (Id.) It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file by Tuesday, April 7, 2015, a response to the motion setting forth why the subpoena should not be quashed. Quinstreet may file a reply by Friday, April 10, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
