Filed: Apr. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Potter Voice Technologies LLC ("Potter Voice") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") jointly and respectfully stipulate and request an order resetting the following discovery-related deadlines. The parties have been working diligently and cooperatively to conduct discovery and schedule depositions. To better prepare the case and address th
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Potter Voice Technologies LLC ("Potter Voice") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") jointly and respectfully stipulate and request an order resetting the following discovery-related deadlines. The parties have been working diligently and cooperatively to conduct discovery and schedule depositions. To better prepare the case and address the..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESET DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Potter Voice Technologies LLC ("Potter Voice") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") jointly and respectfully stipulate and request an order resetting the following discovery-related deadlines.
The parties have been working diligently and cooperatively to conduct discovery and schedule depositions. To better prepare the case and address the unavailability of several witnesses, the parties request a 2-week extension for the fact discovery deadline. To accommodate that extension, the parties also request a 2-week extension for opening expert reports and a 2-week extension for rebuttal expert reports. These requested extensions of discovery deadlines would not affect any court date or any other deadline.
Event Current Date Requested Date
Complete fact discovery April 17, 2015 May 1, 2015
Opening expert reports May 22, 2015 June 5, 2015
Rebuttal expert reports June 22, 2015 July 6, 2015
In addition, on March 20, 2015, the Court granted leave for Apple to file its Motion re Invalidity Under Section 101. In its order, the Court scheduled oral argument on the motion for May 7, 2015, at 2 pm. The parties jointly request that oral argument be rescheduled for May 28, 2015, at 2 pm—a date and time that appear to be available on the Court's calendar. In addition to allowing more time for the parties and Court to prepare for the oral argument, the extension would address a scheduling conflict for Apple's counsel. Apple's counsel are currently scheduled to present oral argument in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington D.C. on May 8, 2015, at 10am, in a separate matter, ParkerVision v. Qualcomm, Nos. 2014-1612, -1655 (Fed. Cir.). As to May 14, 2015 and May 21, 2015, Potter Voice's counsel are currently scheduled for a Markman hearing in a separate matter, Adaptix v. HTC, No. 5:14-cv-02359, on the 14th and scheduled to present arguments at a hearing in Rosset, et al. v. Hunter Engineering Co., No. C 14-01701 LB on the 21st.
Event Current Date Requested Date
Hearing on Invalidity Motion May 7, 2015 at 2 pm May 28, 2015 at 2 pm
(Dkt. 408)
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(c), the following time modifications have previously been entered in this case: (1) the case was stayed from March 20, 2014, through November 21, 2014 (Dkt. 388, 391); (2) on November 21, 2014, the Court lifted the stay and ordered the parties to submit a proposed case schedule (Dkt. 395); (3) on December 11, 2014, the Court set the current case schedule (Dkt. 397).
Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court extend the schedule as noted above.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
