SANDERS v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, C13-03205 EJD. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150420477
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE — FRCP 41(a) EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs JANET L. SANDERS, LARRY SANDERS, and DANIEL RYAN PIERCE, by and through his Guardian ad Litem JANET SANDERS ("Plaintiffs"); and Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, SHERIFF PHIL WOWAK, and DOES 1-200 ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, that Plaintiffs' claims in this case should be dismissed in their entirety, with p
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE — FRCP 41(a) EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs JANET L. SANDERS, LARRY SANDERS, and DANIEL RYAN PIERCE, by and through his Guardian ad Litem JANET SANDERS ("Plaintiffs"); and Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, SHERIFF PHIL WOWAK, and DOES 1-200 ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, that Plaintiffs' claims in this case should be dismissed in their entirety, with pr..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE — FRCP 41(a)
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs JANET L. SANDERS, LARRY SANDERS, and DANIEL RYAN PIERCE, by and through his Guardian ad Litem JANET SANDERS ("Plaintiffs"); and Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, SHERIFF PHIL WOWAK, and DOES 1-200 ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, that Plaintiffs' claims in this case should be dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, Plaintiffs' claims in this case shall be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).
Source: Leagle
