Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Aliphcom, 3:14-cv-03345-WHO. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150421c97
Filed: Apr. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and as supported by the Declaration of S. Wallace Dunwoody filed herewith, Plaintiff iLife Technologies, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Aliphcom d/b/a Jawbone ("Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties' Revised Stipulated Proposed Claim Construction Schedule on March 3, 2015 [Doc. 106]; WHEREAS, per [Doc. 106], Plaintiff's reply
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, and as supported by the Declaration of S. Wallace Dunwoody filed herewith, Plaintiff iLife Technologies, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Aliphcom d/b/a Jawbone ("Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties' Revised Stipulated Proposed Claim Construction Schedule on March 3, 2015 [Doc. 106];

WHEREAS, per [Doc. 106], Plaintiff's reply in support of its claim construction brief would be due on April 22, 2015; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file a reply due to Plaintiff's counsel's scheduling conflicts;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED

Plaintiff shall file its reply in support of its opening claim construction brief on April 24, 2015.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation, it is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer