STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM MAY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 12, 2015

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME

The current initial case management conference is set for Friday May 1, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. The parties hereby stipulate to a request for an order continuing the initial case management conference to Friday June 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., and likewise continuing the pre-case management conference deadlines based on the new case management conference date.

The parties note that the case D'Paris Williams v. City of San Francisco, et al., Case No. 14-cv-05612-SC, is related to this case and a case management conference is set concurrently for both cases. The parties are separately filing a stipulated request for an order likewise continuing the initial case management conference in Williams.

The parties respectfully request that the above stipulation be entered as the Court's Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATED REQUEST FOR SCHEDULING ORDER

I, Peter J. Keith declare as follows:

1. I am a Deputy City Attorney in the Office of the San Francisco City Attorney, counsel of record to Defendants City and County of San Francisco, Theodore Polovina, Joseph Emanuel, and Jose Calvo-Perez. I am also counsel of record to the defendants in the action D'Paris Williams v. City of San Francisco, et al., Case No. 14-cv-05612-SC, a lower-numbered action which this Court found related (Doc. 12). I have personal knowledge of the contents of this declaration, except where indicated otherwise, and I could and would testify competently thereto if called upon to do so.

2. Rule 6-2(a)(1), reasons for requested continuance. A settlement conference is scheduled for May 20 before Magistrate Judge Spero. Continuing the case management conference will enhance the chances of early settlement by keeping costs to a minimum. In addition, counsel do not wish to unnecessarily consume the Court's time with an initial case management conference that may not be necessary. Continuing the initial case management conference to June 12 will allow the parties sufficient time to determine whether this case can settle.

3. Previous time modifications. None, other than one brief extension of time to file an Answer.

4. Effect of the proposed schedule on the schedule for the case. Other than continuing the dates associated with the initial case management conference, the requested continuance is not expected to affect any other deadlines or the parties' requested trial dates.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed April 17, 2015 at San Francisco, California.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court hereby orders that the Case Management Conference in the above entitled action set for May 1, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. is hereby continued to June 12, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.; and that the Case Management Conference in the related case D'Paris Williams v. City of San Francisco, et al., Case No. C 14-05612 SC is set concurrently on June 12, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.

All deadlines associated with the case management conference are continued based on the new case management conference date.