Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PARK v. WELCH FOODS, INC., CV12-6449-PSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150424a57 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION PAUL SINGH GREWAL , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs Elizabeth Park and Carolyn Otto and Defendant Welch Foods, Inc., A Cooperative ("Welch's") hereby stipulate through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification was filed on January 12, 2015. 2. The Opposition brief of Welch's was due on February 23, 2015. 3. The Reply Brief of Plaintiffs is due on March 23,
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION

Plaintiffs Elizabeth Park and Carolyn Otto and Defendant Welch Foods, Inc., A Cooperative ("Welch's") hereby stipulate through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification was filed on January 12, 2015. 2. The Opposition brief of Welch's was due on February 23, 2015. 3. The Reply Brief of Plaintiffs is due on March 23, 2015. 4. The Hearing on the Motion is set for April 14, 2015. 5. The parties have cooperated with regard to depositions, but had to move the depositions of Plaintiffs and of the Welch's witnesses into late February and March, due to weather, travel and calendar issues. 6. The parties have confirmed with the Court Clerk that June 30 is presently available for a hearing, subject to the approval of the Court.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate as follows:

7. Good cause exists to move the Opposition, Reply and Hearing dates, because both sides need a fair opportunity to depose witnesses and utilize the transcripts in the briefing. 8. Subject to the approval of the Court, the briefing schedule will be extended as follows: Welch's Opposition: May 12, 2015 Plaintiff's Reply: June 9, 2015 Hearing: June 30, 2015 (Tuesday, at 10:00 AM) 9. Other dates in the Scheduling Order will be adjusted as necessary, by further order of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer