Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re HP Shareholder Derivative Litigation, C-12-6003 CRB. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150428880 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUATION OF TIME FOR HP TO RESPOND TO SUSHOVAN HUSSAIN'S RENEWED MOTION TO INTERVENE AND ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . This Stipulation is entered into by and among Sushovan Hussain, Stanley Morrical, and Nominal Defendant Hewlett Packard Company ("HP"), by and through their respective counsel. STIPULATION WHEREAS, the Court granted preliminary approval of the third amended settlement on March 13, 2015. (Docket # 319). WHEREAS, the Court issued an o
More

STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUATION OF TIME FOR HP TO RESPOND TO SUSHOVAN HUSSAIN'S RENEWED MOTION TO INTERVENE AND ORDER

This Stipulation is entered into by and among Sushovan Hussain, Stanley Morrical, and Nominal Defendant Hewlett Packard Company ("HP"), by and through their respective counsel.

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, the Court granted preliminary approval of the third amended settlement on March 13, 2015. (Docket # 319).

WHEREAS, the Court issued an order on March 31, 2015 recommending that Sushovan Hussain's "motion to intervene be resolved prior to the final approval hearing." (Docket # 332);

WHEREAS, Sushovan Hussain filed a renewed motion to intervene in the derivative action on April 10, 2015. (Docket # 333);

WHEREAS, HP requests additional time to respond to Mr. Hussain's renewed motion;

WHEREAS, Mr. Hussain does not oppose an extension if approved by the Court but opposes, for scheduling reasons, any continuation of the previously noticed May 15, 2015, hearing date on his renewed motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among HP and the undersigned that:

1. HP and Stanley Morrical may file their responses to Mr. Hussain's renewed motion to intervene on April 29, 2015.

2. Mr. Hussain's reply brief will be due on May 6, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation as modified, and good cause appearing,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer