Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Reardon v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 14-cv-05678-JST. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150501i63 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs KERRY REARDON, JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, JONATHAN GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET and Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (collectively, "the Parties") hereby submit, through the undersigned counsel of record, the following Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled in this matter. In support of this stipulation, the Parties state as fo
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs KERRY REARDON, JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, JONATHAN GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET and Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (collectively, "the Parties") hereby submit, through the undersigned counsel of record, the following Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled in this matter. In support of this stipulation, the Parties state as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed their initial Complaint on December 31, 2014. The case was initially assigned to Judge Joseph Spero.

2. On January 7, 2015, the Court entered an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. That Order set the Case Management Conference for April 3, 2015.

3. Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on January 30, 2015, prior to Defendant's response.

4. On February 18, 2015, the case was reassigned to the Honorable John S. Tigar by the Court.

5. On February 19, 2015, the Court set a new date for the Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Tigar of April 22, 2015.

6. Defendant filed its partial Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on February 27, 2015. That Motion is now fully briefed.

7. On March 31, 2015, the Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference to May 13, 2015. The Court also reset the deadline for the filing of the Joint Case Management Statement to April 29, 2015.

8. The Parties have been meeting and conferring regarding the Joint Case Management Statement and timely filed that document on today's date. See Docket No. 37.

9. However, counsel for Plaintiffs is unavailable to personally attend the Initial Case Management Conference now scheduled for May 13, 2015 because it is his daughter's birthday. Counsel for Plaintiffs lives in Washington, DC and is unable to travel to San Francisco on May 13, 2015 due to personal family commitments related to his daughter's birthday.

10. The Parties have communicated with Judge Tigar's Courtroom Deputy and understand that the Court may be available to reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference for the following Wednesday, May 20, 2015

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through the undersigned, as follows:

1. The Parties agree to continue the Initial Case Management Conference to May 20, 2015 at 2:00 pm, or another date and time agreeable to the Court.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer