Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, 3:13-CV-06001 (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150507a25 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 06, 2015
Latest Update: May 06, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. ("Home Depot") and Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America (collectively, "AUO"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that Home Depot dismisses the entire action with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this stipulation of dismissal, the parties sta
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. ("Home Depot") and Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America (collectively, "AUO"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that Home Depot dismisses the entire action with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In support of this stipulation of dismissal, the parties state as follows:

1. Home Depot and AUO seek the dismissal of this action with prejudice. 2. Each party agrees to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows:

1. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. against Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America in the above-captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and, 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer