Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. OptumINSIGHT, INC., 5:11-CV-0469-EJD. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150507a53 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 06, 2015
Latest Update: May 06, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, and subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Cave Consulting Group, Inc. ("CCGroup") and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff OptumInsight, Inc. ("OptumInsight"), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to modifying the post-trial briefing deadlines. WHEREAS, CCGroup filed its Motion Under Fed.
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY POST-TRIAL BRIEFING DEADLINES

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, and subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Cave Consulting Group, Inc. ("CCGroup") and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff OptumInsight, Inc. ("OptumInsight"), by their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to modifying the post-trial briefing deadlines.

WHEREAS, CCGroup filed its Motion Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2) and 35 U.S.C. § 285 For Attorneys' Fees ("Motion for Attorneys' Fees"), (Dkt. 373), on April 20, 2015, and the deadline for OptumInsight to respond is May 4, 2015, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a);

WHEREAS, CCGroup's Motion for Attorneys' Fees is 24 pages long, and accompanied by 13 exhibits;

WHEREAS, CCGroup also filed a Bill of Costs on April 20, 2015, (Dkt. 374), and the deadline to file objections to CCGroup's Bill of Costs is also May 4, 2015;

WHEREAS, May 4, 2015, was also the deadline for OptumInsight to file its Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial, which OptumInsight filed on April 29, 2015 (Dkt. 379);

WHEREAS, counsel for both parties have conferred and agree that, due to the volume of post-trial briefing and the complexity of the issues involved, a modification to the post-trial briefing deadlines is necessary for the parties to fully and adequately present their arguments and authorities to assist the Court in its disposition of these issues;

WHEREAS, these deadlines have not previously been amended;

WHEREAS, the parties do not anticipate that these modifications will adversely affect the date of the scheduled post-trial hearing, which is set for June 24, 2015;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that, subject the approval of the Court:

1. OptumInsight's response to CCGroup's Motion for Attorneys' Fees shall be filed on May 18, 2015; 2. CCGroup's Reply in support of CCGroup's Motion for Attorneys' Fees shall be filed on June 1, 2015; 3. CCGroup's response to OptumInsight's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial shall be filed on May 27, 2015; and 4. OptumInsight's Reply in support of OptumInsight's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial shall be filed on June 10, 2015.

PROPOSED ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer