Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CUNG LE v. ZUFFA, LLC, 5:14-cv-05484-EJD (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150605c35 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 26, 2015
Latest Update: May 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . Plaintiffs Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, Luis Vazquez, Dennis Hallman, Brandon Vera, Pablo Garza, Gabe Ruediger, Mac Danzig, Kyle Kingsbury and Darren Uyenoyama (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Zuffa, LLC d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC ("Defendant"), pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, request that the Court enter the parties' stipulation below exte
More

STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

Plaintiffs Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, Luis Vazquez, Dennis Hallman, Brandon Vera, Pablo Garza, Gabe Ruediger, Mac Danzig, Kyle Kingsbury and Darren Uyenoyama (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Zuffa, LLC d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC ("Defendant"), pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, request that the Court enter the parties' stipulation below extending the time for Plaintiffs to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery (the "Stipulation").

FACTS UNDERLYING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION

In support of their Stipulation, the parties offer the following facts:

A. Between December 16, 2014 and April 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed five related class actions against Defendant.

B. On January 15, 2015, the parties stipulated that Defendant would respond to Plaintiffs' Complaints by February 27, 2015.

C. On January 30, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Nevada. This Motion is fully briefed and was argued and submitted on May 7, 2015.

D. On February 27, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. This Motion is fully briefed. The hearing on the motion is set for July 23, 2015.

E. On May 13, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Court's decisions on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and its Motion to Transfer Venue.

F. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay is due on May 27, 2015.

G. The parties agree that party and judicial efficiency would be best served by permitting Plaintiffs to have an extension to file their Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery and a concomitant extension for the Defendant to file its Reply brief.

H. No previous extension has been sought as to this motion. This extension does not affect the noticed hearing date or any other proceeding on the Court's calendar.

STIPULATION

In light of the above facts, the parties jointly request that the Court enter the following Stipulation as the Order of the Court.

1. Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery on or before June 3, 2015. The brief shall not exceed 25 pages.

2. Defendant shall file its Reply on or before June 17, 2015. The brief shall not exceed 15 pages.

3. Nothing in this Stipulation precludes Plaintiffs or Defendant from seeking to amend the filing deadlines set forth herein as permitted under the Local Rules if circumstances warrant.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), I attest that all of the above signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer