STOCKTON v. DUCART, CV13-03978 RMW. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150615633
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE (Docket No. 17) RONALD M. WHYTE , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se , filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 challenging the prison's Institutional Classification Committee's 2011 decision during his periodic review hearing to retain petitioner in the secured housing unit ("SHU"). The court issued an order to show cause why the petition should not be granted
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE (Docket No. 17) RONALD M. WHYTE , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se , filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 challenging the prison's Institutional Classification Committee's 2011 decision during his periodic review hearing to retain petitioner in the secured housing unit ("SHU"). The court issued an order to show cause why the petition should not be granted...
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE (Docket No. 17)
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the prison's Institutional Classification Committee's 2011 decision during his periodic review hearing to retain petitioner in the secured housing unit ("SHU"). The court issued an order to show cause why the petition should not be granted. On April 30, 2015, respondent filed an answer. (Docket No. 16.) Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting a sixty-day extension of time to file a traverse. (Docket No. 17.) Petitioner states that on May 12, 2015, he was transferred to another prison and is not in possession of his legal materials. (Id. at 2.)
Having shown good cause, petitioner's motion is GRANTED in part. Petitioner shall file a traverse no later than thirty (30) days after the date this order is filed.
The order terminates docket number 17.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
