Filed: Jun. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick, and Ryan Graves ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on March 31, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, see Docket No.
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick, and Ryan Graves ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on March 31, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, see Docket No. 3..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick, and Ryan Graves ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, see Docket No. 36;
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2015, this Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, see Docket No. 69;
WHEREAS, by the same Order, this Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Complaint on or before July 2, 2015, see Docket No. 69;
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and Plaintiffs have indicated that they intend to file a Second Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, in the absence of an Order by this Court modifying the pleadings schedule, Defendants may be required to file a responsive pleading on or before June 26, 2015, in accordance with Fed. Rule Civ. Pro. 12(a)(4)(A)—a date before the deadline to file a Second Amended Complaint;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, to the following deadline:
• Defendants must file a responsive pleading no later than thirty (30) days from the date of filing of the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
