Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MicroTechnologies, LLC v. Autonomy, Inc., 15-cv-2220. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150629709 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT RONALD M. WHYTE , District Judge . This Stipulation is entered into by and among MicroTechnologies, LLC, Plaintiff, and Defendants Autonomy, Inc. and Nominal Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP"), by and through their respective counsel. STIPULATION WHEREAS, Nominal Defendant HP's and Defendant Autonomy Inc.'s (referred to collectively as "Defendants") responses to MicroTechnologies, LLC's ("MicroTechnologies") C
More

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

This Stipulation is entered into by and among MicroTechnologies, LLC, Plaintiff, and Defendants Autonomy, Inc. and Nominal Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP"), by and through their respective counsel.

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Nominal Defendant HP's and Defendant Autonomy Inc.'s (referred to collectively as "Defendants") responses to MicroTechnologies, LLC's ("MicroTechnologies") Complaint are presently due June 10, 2015; and

WHEREAS, Defendants request until June 30, 2015, to respond to MicroTechnologies' Complaint, and MicroTechnologies assents to such requested extension;

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Defendants and MicroTechnologies that:

Defendants may file their respective responses to MicroTechnologies' Complaint on June 30, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

[] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Defendants' time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended until June 30, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer