STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ERROR ON DEPOSITION READ-IN

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

STIPULATION

On Monday, June 15, 2015, during the trial of this matter and in the course of reading from the deposition transcript of Barbara Leashore, counsel for Plaintiff inadvertently omitted a question and answer from that transcript. The omitted portion was later read into the record at 178:21-23 of that day's trial transcript. Exh. A to Declaration of Elizabeth Fulton ("Fulton Decl."). The reporter noted this omitted portion, as well as the discussion thereon between counsel and the Court, on an index page of the June 15 trial transcript (67:14). Exh. B to Fulton Decl. The Court subsequently directed the parties to meet and confer with respect to a stipulation that would identify and rectify this error in the read-in.

The parties hereby stipulate that the omitted portion (178:21-23) be treated as if it had been read between lines 16 and 17 on page 173 of the June 15 trial transcript, Exh. C to Fulton Decl., so as to accurately track the deposition of Ms. Leashore.

This stipulation is submitted jointly by all the parties to this action. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-12, a complete list of the parties is contained on the signature page of this document. A proposed order is appended herewith.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. The June 15, 2015 trial transcript shall be treated as if the matters appearing at 178:21-23 had instead been read in between lines 16 and 17 on page 173 of that transcript.