Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

YUCESOY v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3:15-cv-00262-EMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150701c45
Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITION EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, and Travis Kalanick, ("Defendants"),(collectively, the "Parties")
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO PERMIT PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A BRIEF SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, and Travis Kalanick, ("Defendants"),(collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and agree that the date for Defendants to file their reply in support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015, and that Plaintiffs be permitted to file a brief supplement to their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration no later than July 1, 2015:

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled for August 6, 2015;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs plan to seek leave to file a brief supplement to their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015;

WHEREAS, this supplement will further clarify and lend support to Plaintiffs' argument and will aid the Court in its consideration of Defendants' Motion;

WHEREAS, the Court and parties will not be prejudiced by a brief delay in the filing of Defendants' Reply Memorandum until July 8, 2015;

WHEREAS, this extra time will permit Defendants to respond to the brief supplement that Plaintiffs plan to submit in support of their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. 72) by July 1, 2015;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court's approval, that:

(1) The due date for Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion to Compel Arbitration currently set for June 30, 2015, be moved to July 8, 2015; (2) Plaintiffs be permitted to submit an Administrative Motion to Supplement their Opposition Brief (Doc. 72) no later than July 1, 2015.

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer