JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) ("section 406"). ECF No. 31. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion.
In 2008, Plaintiff applied to the Social Security Administration ("SSA") for social security disability benefits. After an administrative law judge ("ALJ") denied benefits, Plaintiff appealed the denial to this Court.
On March 31, 2014, pursuant to a stipulation, the Court awarded Plaintiff $2,737.39 in attorneys' fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). ECF No. 27. Plaintiff filed this motion on April 23, 2015, seeking an attorneys' fees award of $6,908.40 under section 406(b), which represents 25% of the past-due benefits awarded to Plaintiff.
Section 406(b) provides, in relevant part, that "[w]henever a court renders a judgment favorable to a [social security] claimant, . . . the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee" for the claimant's counsel, which can be no more than 25% of the total of past-due benefits awarded to the claimant. 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). A court may award such a fee even if the court's judgment did not immediately result in an award of past-due benefits; where the court has rendered a judgment favorable to a claimant by reversing an earlier determination by an ALJ and remanding for further consideration, the court may calculate the 25% fee based upon any past-due benefits awarded on remand.
In considering a motion for attorneys' fees under section 406(b), the court must review counsel's request "as an independent check" to ensure that the contingency fee agreement "yield[s] reasonable results."
The Court must offset an award of section 406(b) attorneys' fees by any award of fees granted under the EAJA.
The Court finds that Plaintiff's counsel's fee request is reasonable. As an initial matter, the Court notes that the contingency fee agreement between Plaintiff and his counsel is within the statutory ceiling; the agreement provides that if the SSA awards Plaintiff past-due benefits, Plaintiff will pay counsel a fee no greater than 25% of the past-due benefits awarded.
Further, the Court finds that Plaintiff's counsel's work on this case was not insubstantial: he succeeded in having this matter remanded to the SSA, where Plaintiff prevailed and obtained past-due benefits as well as ongoing benefits. ECF No. 31, Ex. 3. Nothing suggests that Plaintiff's counsel provided substandard representation, or that Plaintiff's counsel delayed this litigation in order to amass more in potential fees. And the time Plaintiff's counsel spent on work before this Court—approximately 24 hours of attorney and paralegal time—is not out of proportion to the fee award.
After a review of the record, the Court finds the fee request reasonable and that it does not constitute a "windfall" to Plaintiff's counsel.
For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby grants Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees, and awards fees in the amount of $6,908.40 to Plaintiff's counsel, less $2,737.39, the amount previously awarded and delivered to counsel under the EAJA. Plaintiff's counsel is thus entitled to a net total award of $4,171.01 in attorneys' fees, which the SSA shall withhold from the $27,633.60 award of past-due benefits, and pay to Plaintiff's counsel.