IN RE MyFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION, 3-13-cv-3072-EMC. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150717912
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 14, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the remaining causes of action asserted in the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 154) by Plaintiffs Dr. George Oremland and Deb Makowski (the "Dismissed Plaintiffs") against Defendant Ford Motor Company are DISMISSED WITH PREJUD
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the remaining causes of action asserted in the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 154) by Plaintiffs Dr. George Oremland and Deb Makowski (the "Dismissed Plaintiffs") against Defendant Ford Motor Company are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDI..
More
STIPULATION AND[PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the remaining causes of action asserted in the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 154) by Plaintiffs Dr. George Oremland and Deb Makowski (the "Dismissed Plaintiffs") against Defendant Ford Motor Company are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because they have recently determined that their vehicles are not equipped with a MyFord Touch or MyLincoln Touch system.
In agreeing to this stipulation, Defendant expressly reserves its right to seek depositions of the Dismissed Plaintiffs and to seek payment of costs reasonably incurred in preparing its defense to the Dismissed Plaintiffs' claims. The Dismissed Plaintiffs likewise reserve their right to oppose and object to any request for deposition of the Dismissed Plaintiffs, and/or for payment of costs, and/or any other relief, made by Defendant.
[PROPOSED]ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
