Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GeoTag, Inc. v. Zoosk, Inc., 13-cv-00217-EMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150723711
Filed: Jul. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that all claims and counterclaims between Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. ("GeoTag") and Defendant Zoosk, Inc. ("Zoosk") (collectively "the parties") in the above-captioned action have been resolved between the parties, and that the terms of that resolution include, inter alia, the covenants not to sue provided by GeoTag attached hereto as Exhibit A, an
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that all claims and counterclaims between Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. ("GeoTag") and Defendant Zoosk, Inc. ("Zoosk") (collectively "the parties") in the above-captioned action have been resolved between the parties, and that the terms of that resolution include, inter alia, the covenants not to sue provided by GeoTag attached hereto as Exhibit A, and that all parties should bear their own fees and costs.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties request that this Court dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims between the parties in this action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer