Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

E.DIGITAL CORPORATION v. DROPCAM, INC., 3:14-cv-04922-JST. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150803468 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT AND NOTICE TO THE COURT REGARDING RESOLVED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation ("e.Digital") and Defendant Dropcam, Inc. ("Dropcam") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby make a stipulated request to amend the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3) ("Joint Statement") (Dkt. No. 49) and hereby provide notice to the
More

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT AND NOTICE TO THE COURT REGARDING RESOLVED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES

WHEREAS, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation ("e.Digital") and Defendant Dropcam, Inc. ("Dropcam") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby make a stipulated request to amend the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3) ("Joint Statement") (Dkt. No. 49) and hereby provide notice to the Court that certain claim construction disputes have been resolved;

WHEREAS, the Parties file this stipulation and notice in light of a mutual agreement having been reached between the Parties regarding the construction of certain claim terms;

WHEREAS, the Parties, having met and conferred, were able to reach a compromise with respect to the claim terms "social template," "unique social signature," "optical sensor," and "accurate," as set forth in the table below;

Claim Term or Phrase Agreed Construction "social template" "data structure associated with a social hierarchy and one or more social signatures" "unique social signature" "social signature associated with a specific social template at the time of processing" "optical sensor" plain and ordinary meaning "accurate" "capable of desired processing"

WHEREAS, during the meet and confer process, the Parties discussed compromise constructions for the term "social signature" and, while the Parties were unable to fully resolve the dispute, the Parties narrowed the dispute as set forth in the table below;

Claim Term or Plaintiff's Proposed Defendant's Proposed Phrase Construction Construction "social signature" "raw or processed data and/or "combination of sensor data other information based on indicative of a type of activity" sensors"

WHEREAS, during the meet and confer process Dropcam proposed a compromise that the term "information" be construed as "a report about the identified social signature" and Dropcam anticipates it may be discussed at the hearing and, therefore, provides notice herein, however, e.Digital objects to the Court considering this new construction on the ground it is untimely under the Court's Scheduling Order and Patent LR 4-2, 4-3 and 4-5, and reserves the right to raise arguments not raised in its briefs in rebuttal should the Court be inclined to consider the same;

WHEREAS, the Parties also agree that neither will call witnesses at the Claim Construction Hearing and that the Claim Construction Hearing can be completed in three (3), rather than four (4), hours;

WHEREAS, the Parties make a stipulated request to amend the Joint Statement to reflect mutual agreement having been reached regarding the construction of the claim terms "social template," "unique social signature," "optical sensor," and "accurate," and to reflect the narrowing of the dispute regarding the construction of the claim term "social signature," as reflected in the Proposed Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3), attached hereto as Exhibit A.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, by e.Digital and Dropcam, through their respective counsel, that the Parties shall file an Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement and Pre-Hearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3), attached hereto as Exhibit A.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, Madeleine E. Greene, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Pamela Chalk of Handal & Associates has concurred in this filing.

Dated: July 30, 2015 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Madeleine E. Greene Madeleine E. Greene Attorneys for Defendant DROPCAM, INC.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer