Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

O'Halloran v. GCA Services Group, Inc., 3:15-cv-00868-HSG. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150824659 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . STIPULATION In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and the Court's August 18, 2015 Order (Docket Entry No. 30), Plaintiffs Christopher O'Halloran, Devon Oliver, and Davion McFarland and Defendant GCA Services Group of Texas, LP (erroneously sued as GCA Services Group, Inc.) stipulate and agree as follows: (1) On February 26, 2015, Plainti
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and the Court's August 18, 2015 Order (Docket Entry No. 30), Plaintiffs Christopher O'Halloran, Devon Oliver, and Davion McFarland and Defendant GCA Services Group of Texas, LP (erroneously sued as GCA Services Group, Inc.) stipulate and agree as follows:

(1) On February 26, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Original Complaint which named GCA Services Group, Inc., who on Plaintiffs' information and belief was Plaintiffs' presumptive employer, as the only Defendant to this action. See Docket, Document Number 1.

(2) On June 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave of Court to File Amended Complaint. See Docket, Document Number 26.

(3) Plaintiffs' Motion requests leave of Court to file an Amended Complaint that includes GCA Services Group of Texas, LP as a Defendant on the grounds that, on Plaintiffs' information and belief, this entity was also Plaintiffs' presumptive employer. Id.

(4) Plaintiffs submitted a proposed amended complaint with their Motion. Id., Ex. 1.

(5) Defendant has not opposed, and does not oppose the relief requested through Plaintiffs' Motion.

WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the Parties and their respective counsel that Plaintiffs should be granted leave of Court to file the First Amended Complaint that was submitted with Plaintiffs' Motion.

LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION

In accordance with U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. The filing attorney will maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court, if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party, until one year after the final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any).

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Christopher O'Halloran, Devon Oliver, and Davion McFarland are granted leave of Court to file the First Amended Complaint that was submitted with their original Motion for Leave of Court to File First Amended Complaint.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer