Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Osborne v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 3:15-cv-2653-VC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150824673 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS VINCENT CHHABRIA , District Judge . WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff, Yuri Osborne ("Plaintiff"), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, with Defendant, Kraft Foods Group, Inc. ("Defendant") (together, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows, subject to a Court Order approving the Stipulation;
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff, Yuri Osborne ("Plaintiff"), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, with Defendant, Kraft Foods Group, Inc. ("Defendant") (together, the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows, subject to a Court Order approving the Stipulation;

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2015 Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 15) ("Motion"), which is currently pending and set for hearing on September 24, 2015, before this Honorable Court;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's deadline to file its Response to Defendant's Motion ("Response") is currently set for August 26, 2015;

WHEREAS, Defendant's deadline to file its Reply in support of its Motion ("Reply") is currently set for September 2, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a 3-week extension for Plaintiff to file its Response and for Defendant to file its Reply, and further agree to a 3-week continuance of the hearing currently set for Defendant's Motion;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file its Response to September 16, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend Defendant's deadline to file its Reply to September 23, 2015;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to continue the hearing on Defendant's Motion to October 15, 2015;

WHEREAS, good cause exists for the extensions because Plaintiff and Defendant require additional time to properly respond and reply, respectively, regarding Defendant's Motion, and the Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to the stipulated extensions;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, that:

(1) Plaintiff has until September 16, 2015, to file a Response to Defendant's Motion; (2) Defendant has until September 23, 2015, to file its Reply to Defendant's Motion; (3) The hearing on Defendant's Motion should be continued to October 15, 2015;

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

PROPOSEDORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, it is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer