Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 3:14-cv-05241 EMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150831744 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") and Rasier, LLC ("Rasier") (collectively "Defendants") may have until fourteen (14) days after the Court's ruling on the motion to consolidate filed in the captioned matter (ECF No. 84) or the filing of a Consolidated Complaint th
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-1, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") and Rasier, LLC ("Rasier") (collectively "Defendants") may have until fourteen (14) days after the Court's ruling on the motion to consolidate filed in the captioned matter (ECF No. 84) or the filing of a Consolidated Complaint that includes the captioned matter, whichever is later, to file their answer, motion or other response to the then-operative Complaint in this matter. Based on the parties' meet and confer efforts, they agree the most efficient course is to await the final outcome of the motion to consolidate before Defendants are required to respond to the Complaint in this matter and Plaintiffs are required to take further action. The Second Amended Complaint was filed on August 25, 2015. No other extensions have been granted for the time for Defendants to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. No objections, arguments, or defenses are waived by any party by virtue of this stipulation. Defendants reserve all rights, including the right to seek via stipulation or Court order additional time to respond to any consolidated complaint that may be filed in this action. This stipulation will not require the alteration of any deadline already set by Court Order.

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer