Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IRON WORKERS MID-SOUTH PENSION FUND v. JOHNS, C 3:13-cv-00550-SC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150904642 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE & [PROPOSED] ORDER SAMUEL CONTI , District Judge . Plaintiff Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund, nominal defendant PG&E Corporation, and defendants Christopher P. Johns, Kent M. Harvey, Dinyar B. Mistry, C. Lee Cox, Barry Lawson Williams, David R. Andrews, Barbara L. Rambo, Maryellen C. Herringer, Richard A. Meserve, Roger H. Kimmel, Lewis Chew, Peter A. Darbee, and David M. Lawrence hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their undersigne
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE & [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund, nominal defendant PG&E Corporation, and defendants Christopher P. Johns, Kent M. Harvey, Dinyar B. Mistry, C. Lee Cox, Barry Lawson Williams, David R. Andrews, Barbara L. Rambo, Maryellen C. Herringer, Richard A. Meserve, Roger H. Kimmel, Lewis Chew, Peter A. Darbee, and David M. Lawrence hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 3, 2015, the parties submitted to the Court a Joint Status Report;

WHEREAS, the Joint Status Report informed the Court of the status of the State Derivative Actions proceeding under the caption PG&E San Bruno Fire Derivative Cases, Case No. JCCP 4648-C, pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo (the "State Court");

WHEREAS, in the Joint Status Report the parties requested that this action remain stayed pending resolution of the State Derivative Actions;

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2015, the Court issued a Clerk's Notice setting a Status Conference for September 11, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. for the parties to address the status of this case;

WHEREAS, counsel for the individual defendants has a conflict on September 11, 2015, requiring counsel to be out-of-state; and

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Status Conference currently scheduled for September 11, 2015, should be continued;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the undersigned parties that:

The Status Conference currently scheduled for September 11, 2015, should be continued to October 23, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The above STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE & [PROPOSED] ORDER is APPROVED. The Status Conference currently scheduled for September 11, 2015, is continued to October 23, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer