Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SISKIN v. FOWNES BROTHERS & CO., INC., 4:15-CV-02922-JSW. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150922680 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2015
Summary: NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT; STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINES PENDING SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . Plaintiff David R. Siskin and Defendant Fownes Brothers & Co., Inc. respectfully submit this Notice of Pending Settlement, Stipulated Request to Continue All Case Deadlines Pending Settlement, and [Proposed] Order. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state the following: 1. The parties have reached a settlement-in-principal of a
More

NOTICE OF PENDING SETTLEMENT; STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINES PENDING SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff David R. Siskin and Defendant Fownes Brothers & Co., Inc. respectfully submit this Notice of Pending Settlement, Stipulated Request to Continue All Case Deadlines Pending Settlement, and [Proposed] Order.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1), the parties state the following:

1. The parties have reached a settlement-in-principal of all claims in this action.

2. The parties anticipate drafting a formal settlement agreement that will resolve this matter entirely. The parties expect to submit a Joint Stipulation and Dismissal with Prejudice by October 2nd, 2015.

3. Accordingly, the parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court stay all remaining dates in this action as follows, to provide sufficient time to finalize a settlement agreement:

Eventm Presently Proposed Scheduled Date Date Last day for Defendant Fownes Brothers & Co, Inc. to Sept. 21, 2015 Oct. 9, 2015 respond to Plaintiff's Complaint Last day for parties to file joint case management Sept. 18, 2015 November 6, 2015 statement Initial Case Management Conference Sept. 25, 2015 November 13, 2015

4. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(2), the parties have not previously requested any extension of time.

5. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(3), the requested time modification would delay the current case management conference schedule by 28 calendar days.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. AS MODIFIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer