Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. OptumINSIGHT, INC., 3:15-cv-03424. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150925h21 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, the parties stipulate to an extension of nine days, up to and including October 9, 2015, for Plaintiff Cave Consulting Group, Inc. to file its Opposition to Defendant OptumInsight, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. In addition, the parties stipulate to an extension of seven days, up to and includi
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, the parties stipulate to an extension of nine days, up to and including October 9, 2015, for Plaintiff Cave Consulting Group, Inc. to file its Opposition to Defendant OptumInsight, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. In addition, the parties stipulate to an extension of seven days, up to and including October 23, 2015, for Defendant OptumInsight, Inc. to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss.

Defendant's Motion to Dismiss was filed on September 16, 2015. Plaintiff's deadline for responding to the Motion, without the extension, is therefore September 30, 2015. Defendant's deadline for filing a reply, without the extension, is seven days after the Plaintiff's opposition is due. Civil L.R. 7-3.

These extensions will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. The hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference are currently scheduled for November 6, 2015.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that the time for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is extended to October 9, 2015, and the time for Defendant to file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss is extended to October 23, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer