Filed: Sep. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATED REQUEST TO SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's August 12, 2015 Order, ECF No. 28, the parties respectfully submit this status report and request that the Court enter the schedule set forth below for summary judgment briefing in this matter: 1. On August 11, 2015, the parties requested a continuance of summary judgment briefing in this matter, because the Defendants had determined that the single document th
Summary: ORDER STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATED REQUEST TO SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's August 12, 2015 Order, ECF No. 28, the parties respectfully submit this status report and request that the Court enter the schedule set forth below for summary judgment briefing in this matter: 1. On August 11, 2015, the parties requested a continuance of summary judgment briefing in this matter, because the Defendants had determined that the single document tha..
More
ORDER STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATED REQUEST TO SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court's August 12, 2015 Order, ECF No. 28, the parties respectfully submit this status report and request that the Court enter the schedule set forth below for summary judgment briefing in this matter:
1. On August 11, 2015, the parties requested a continuance of summary judgment briefing in this matter, because the Defendants had determined that the single document that remained in contention in this case could be reprocessed and released in part. See Stipulated Request for Continuance of Summary Judgment Briefing, ECF No. 27 at 2. Defendants indicated that they would produce the reprocessed document, with redactions and a Vaughn index for that document, by September 3, 2015. Id. The parties stipulated that they would then confer regarding whether any substantive issues remained in contention in this matter. Id. The parties requested that they be permitted to submit a status report by September 25, 2015, proposing a briefing schedule for summary judgment motions if any substantive issues remained in contention at that time. Id.
2. On September 3, 2015, the Defendants produced to Plaintiff the reprocessed document, with redactions under FOIA exemptions (b)(1), (b)(3), and (b)(5), along with a Vaughn index for that document.
3. Having conferred, the parties have recognized that substantive issues remain in contention regarding the redactions taken in the document, and respectfully request that the Court enter the following schedule for summary judgment motions in this matter:
a. On or before October 30, 2015, defendants will file their motion for summary judgment.
b. On or before December 4, 2015, plaintiff will file its combined cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to defendants' motion.
c. On or before January 8, 2016, defendants will file their combined opposition to plaintiff's motion and reply in support of their motion.
d. On or before January 22, 2016, plaintiff will file its reply in support of its motion.
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
I, Julia Berman, hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence of Andrew Crocker, counsel for the Plaintiff, Electronic Frontier Foundation, in the filing of this document.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, it is hereby ORDERED that:
a. On or before October 30, 2015, defendants will file their motion for summary judgment.
b. On or before December 4, 2015, plaintiff will file its combined cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to defendants' motion.
c. On or before January 8, 2016, defendants will file their combined opposition to plaintiff's motion and reply in support of their motion.
d. On or before January 22, 2016, plaintiff will file its reply in support of its motion
IT IS SO ORDERED.
