Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, 4:15-cv-03783-JSW. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151007a37 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . WHEREAS, on September 1, 2015, Costco Wholesale Corporation was served in the above-captioned matter; WHEREAS, on September 8, 2015, CP Food Products, Inc. was served in the above-captioned matter and Charoen Pokphand Foods, PCL (incorporated in Thailand), has agreed to waive service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4; WHEREAS, Defendants do not w
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2015, Costco Wholesale Corporation was served in the above-captioned matter;

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2015, CP Food Products, Inc. was served in the above-captioned matter and Charoen Pokphand Foods, PCL (incorporated in Thailand), has agreed to waive service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4;

WHEREAS, Defendants do not waive, and expressly reserve, all available defenses, including as to jurisdiction;

WHEREAS, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend the Date for Defendants to Respond to the Complaint on September 21, 2015 and agreed to propose a revised schedule to the Court on or before October 6, 2015;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), all parties agree that:

(1) Defendants' responses to the Complaint shall be filed on or before October 30, 2015;

(2) Plaintiff's oppositions to Defendants' motions to dismiss, if any, shall be filed on or before November 17, 2015;

(3) Defendants' replies in support of their motions, if any, shall be filed on or before December 7, 2015;

(4) The hearing on Defendants' motions shall be on December 18, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., or such other date as the Court may find convenient; and

(5) The parties will meet and confer about the length of briefing in connection with any motions to dismiss and, if they believe they need relief from the applicable rules, may seek such relief from the Court in advance of the applicable filing deadlines.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Caroline N. Mitchell, attest that concurrence in filing this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer