Filed: Oct. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ([PROPOSED] ORDER FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH) RONALD M. WHYTE , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Neas Limited, individually in its own right and derivatively on behalf of Nitol Solar Limited, and Andrey Tretyakov commenced this action by filing a complaint (the "Complaint") on April 8, 2015; WHEREAS, defendants Rusnano USA, Inc. ("Rusnano USA"); OJSC Rusnano; Rusnano Management Company, LLC; Rusnano Capital, A
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ([PROPOSED] ORDER FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH) RONALD M. WHYTE , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Neas Limited, individually in its own right and derivatively on behalf of Nitol Solar Limited, and Andrey Tretyakov commenced this action by filing a complaint (the "Complaint") on April 8, 2015; WHEREAS, defendants Rusnano USA, Inc. ("Rusnano USA"); OJSC Rusnano; Rusnano Management Company, LLC; Rusnano Capital, A...
More
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
([PROPOSED] ORDER FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH)
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Neas Limited, individually in its own right and derivatively on behalf of Nitol Solar Limited, and Andrey Tretyakov commenced this action by filing a complaint (the "Complaint") on April 8, 2015;
WHEREAS, defendants Rusnano USA, Inc. ("Rusnano USA"); OJSC Rusnano; Rusnano Management Company, LLC; Rusnano Capital, A.G.; Rusnano Capital, LLC; Fonds Rusnano Capital, S.A.; Anatoly Chubais; Oleg Kiselev; Irina Rapoport; Sergey Polikarpov; and Valery Rostokin (collectively, the "Moving Defendants") filed motions to dismiss the Complaint on September 11, 2015;
WHEREAS, rather than oppose the motions to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (the "First Amended Complaint") on October 9, 2015;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have agreed to a short extension of the Moving Defendants' time to respond to the First Amended Complaint;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, as follows: the Moving Defendants' time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended to and including October 30, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
