welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, N.D. California
  4. 2015
  5. ADAPTIX, INC. v. SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 5:14-cv-01385-PSG (2015)

ADAPTIX, INC. v. SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 5:14-cv-01385-PSG (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151113b42 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD-PARTY DISCOVERY (Re: Docket No. 177) (Re: Docket No. 185) (Re: Docket No. 192) (Re: Docket No. 268) (Re: Docket No. 266) (Re: Docket No. 260) (Re: Docket No. 222) PAUL S. GREWAL , District Judge . Before the court is a motion by Adaptix, Inc., Plaintiff in each of these related cases. Adaptix seeks leave to conduct discovery on non-party Qualcomm Incorporated after the close of fact discovery. 1 Adaptix has since confirmed that further
More

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD-PARTY DISCOVERY

(Re: Docket No. 177)

(Re: Docket No. 185)

(Re: Docket No. 192)

(Re: Docket No. 268)

(Re: Docket No. 266)

(Re: Docket No. 260)

(Re: Docket No. 222)

Before the court is a motion by Adaptix, Inc., Plaintiff in each of these related cases. Adaptix seeks leave to conduct discovery on non-party Qualcomm Incorporated after the close of fact discovery.1 Adaptix has since confirmed that further discovery in most of these cases—the ones involving Defendants Sony Mobil Communications, Inc. and ZTE Corporation2—is unwarranted because the cases are likely to settle or be dismissed.3 The only remaining issue, therefore, is whether third-party discovery is justified in the two cases involving Defendant Kyocera Corporation.4

Adaptix acknowledges that its subpoenas to Qualcomm in the Kyocera cases did not request that Qualcomm produce any source code. Although Adaptix characterizes this as an associate's oversight, Adaptix did not correct the mistake in the several months after it issued the subpoena in July. There is no process by which the court may order further discovery under Fed. R.Civ.P. 45. The motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. See Case No. 14-1385, Docket No. 177; Case No. 14-2894, Docket No. 185; Case No. 14-2895, Docket No. 192; Case No. 15-0165, Docket No. 268; Case No. 15-0166, Docket No. 266; Case No. 15-0167, Docket No. 260; Case No. 15-0168, Docket No. 222.
2. See Case No. 14-1385; Case No. 15-0165; Case No. 15-0166; Case No. 15-0167; Case No. 15-0168.
3. See Case No. 14-1385, Docket No. 186; Case No. 14-2894, Docket No. 188; Case No. 14-2895, Docket No. 196; Case No. 15-0165, Docket No. 279; Case No. 15-0166, Docket No. 273; Case No. 15-0167, Docket No. 267; Case No. 15-0168, Docket No. 229.
4. See Case No. 14-2894; Case No. 14-2895.
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
5:14-cv-01385-PSG 5:14-cv-02894-PSG 5:14-cv-02895-PSG 5:15-cv-00165-PSG 5:15-cv-00166-PSG 5:15-cv-00167-PSG 5:15-cv-00168-PSG
Counsels
  • Paul J. Hayes
  • Anthony Louis Miele
  • Christopher D. Banys
  • Christopher J Judge
  • Daniel McGonagle,
  • James J. Foster
  • Jason C. Williams
  • Jennifer Lu Gilbert
  • Keith Bryan Smiley
  • Kevin Gannon
  • Michael James Ercolini
  • Paul J Hayes
  • Richard Cheng-hong Lin
  • Samiyah Diaz
  • Steven Edward Lipman
  • Charles Craig Tadlock
  • Michelle Ann Herrera
  • Callie McCarthy Bjurstrom
  • Inge Larish
  • James C. Williams
  • James Collin Williams
  • Nicole Sara Cunningham
  • Steven Arthur Moore
  • Steven A. Moore
  • Jon Vensel Swenson
  • Morgan Elizabeth Grissum,
  • Douglas Kubehl
  • Morgan Elizabeth Grissum
  • David Michael Keyzer
  • David Allan Kays
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer