Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

YUCESOY v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3:15-cv-00262-EMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151123768 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Travis Kalanick ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties' stipulation that the deposition o
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Travis Kalanick ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties' stipulation that the deposition of Plaintiff Yucesoy shall take place on January 8, 2016, in San Francisco, CA, see Dkt. 126;

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to "meet and confer and to submit to the Court a stipulation regarding expedited discovery" in advance of Mr. Yucesoy's deposition, see Dkt. 125 at 2;

WHEREAS, the pleadings may not be settled in advance of the January 8, 2016 deposition of Mr. Yucesoy;

WHEREAS, in order to complete "expedited discovery before Mr. Yucesoy's deposition takes place" in light of the Court's order that "Defendants shall depose Mr. Yucesoy on all issues" but that "Mr. Yucesoy may be subject to recall if reasonably necessary" (Dkt. 374), the Parties are agreed that (1) Defendants may propound discovery on Mr. Yucesoy on or before November 20, 2015, based on the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint even though some of the claims in the Second Amended Complaint have been dismissed, and Plaintiffs will respond to any such discovery within fourteen days of service; and (2) Defendants may serve additional discovery on Mr. Yucesoy within seven days after Plaintiffs file their Third Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs will respond to any such discovery within fourteen days of service.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court's approval, that:

(1) Defendants may propound discovery on Mr. Yucesoy based on the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint by November 20, 2015, and Plaintiffs will respond to any such discovery within fourteen (14) days of service; and

(2) Defendants may propound additional discovery on Mr. Yucesoy within seven (7) days after Plaintiffs file their Third Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs will respond to any such discovery within fourteen (14) days of service.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer