Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Velez, CR-15-0102-WHA. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151125c10 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 24, 2015
Summary: UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR APPEAL; AND APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; AND DECLARATION IN SUPPORT. WILLIAM H. ALSUP , District Judge. I BACKGROUND On February 20, 2015, Magistrate Judge Spero reviewed a financial declaration and appointed the office of the Public Defender to represent Mr. Velez. That office represented Mr. Velez through trial. After trial, Mr. Velez's family hired undersigned counsel to represent him for sentencing only. Un
More

UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR APPEAL; AND APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; AND DECLARATION IN SUPPORT.

I

BACKGROUND

On February 20, 2015, Magistrate Judge Spero reviewed a financial declaration and appointed the office of the Public Defender to represent Mr. Velez. That office represented Mr. Velez through trial. After trial, Mr. Velez's family hired undersigned counsel to represent him for sentencing only. Undersigned counsel has prepared the notice of appeal, and is prepared to file it.

Mr. Velez cannot afford to hire appellate counsel. Accordingly, Mr. Velez is requesting this Court to allow him to proceed in forma pauperis, and to appointed counsel to represent Mr. Velez on appeal.

II.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated below, Mr. Velez respectfully requests this Court to allow Mr. Velez to proceed in forma pauperis and to appoint counsel to represent Mr. Velez on appeal.

DECLARATION OF COUNSEL

I, ERICK GUZMAN, declare the following:

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California and admitted to practice before this Court. Except where otherwise expressly noted, I state the following on personal knowledge, and if called as a witness, could testify competently thereto.

2. I am the attorney of record in this case.

3. Mr. Velez wishes to pursue an appeal.

4. Mr. Velez cannot afford to hire counsel for appeal. No material changes have occurred regarding Mr. Velez's finances since he submitted the financial declaration that led to the magistrate appointing trial counsel for him.

I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the forgoing is true and correct. Signed this 23rd day of November, 2015 in Santa Rosa, California.

Based on the Ex Parte application and supporting declaration of counsel, and for good cause shown:

IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Velez be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel be appointed to represent Mr. Velez on appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer