STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiffs, acting by and through their attorney of record, the defendant City of San Leandro, acting by and through its attorney of record, and the defendant City of Oakland, acting by and through its attorney of record, have met and conferred regarding scheduling issues and have agreed to a continuance of the case management conference as follows:

In the time since this CMC was set by this Court, Defendant City of San Leandro's counsel, Gregory Fox, has had a scheduling conflict arise with an Alameda Superior Court multi-party matter regarding a traumatic brain injury of a young child. The parties in Dani v. City of Fremont, et al. have extensively met and conferred regarding dates for the parents' depositions and December 4, 2015 was the only day that all the parties were available to proceed on these important depositions.

Therefore, the parties request that the Case Management Conference now scheduled for Friday December 4, 2015 to be continued to Friday, January 8, 2015, so that the parties will file a joint case management conference statement Thursday December 30, 3015. Rule 26 disclosures were exchanged on November 18, 2015.

The parties have agreed to ENE and the next phone call with the ENE Evaluator is scheduled for November 23, 2015.

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION

I, Gregory M. Fox, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.