Filed: Dec. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties to this action repectfully submit the following Joint Stipulation Requesting Modification to the Court's Scheduling Order (D.E. #46), dated July 8, 2015. 1. The proposed change only affects the date for the Joint Claim Construction Statement. 2. The Joint Claim Construction Statement, which is currecntly December 4, 2015, shall be extended
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties to this action repectfully submit the following Joint Stipulation Requesting Modification to the Court's Scheduling Order (D.E. #46), dated July 8, 2015. 1. The proposed change only affects the date for the Joint Claim Construction Statement. 2. The Joint Claim Construction Statement, which is currecntly December 4, 2015, shall be extended u..
More
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties to this action repectfully submit the following Joint Stipulation Requesting Modification to the Court's Scheduling Order (D.E. #46), dated July 8, 2015.
1. The proposed change only affects the date for the Joint Claim Construction Statement.
2. The Joint Claim Construction Statement, which is currecntly December 4, 2015, shall be extended until December 9, 2015.
3. From November 6, 2015, when the parties exchanged patent L.R. 4-2 preliminary claim constructions, through today, the parties have met and conferred regarding claim construction issues in an effort to narrow and crystallize the disputes to be presented to the Court. The parties request this brief extension to facilitate the preparation of a joint statement reflecting the current state of the parties' agreements and disputes.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for Apple has obtained the concurrence of THX's counsel in the filing of this Stipulated Request.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
