Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TOP AGENT NETWORK, INC. v. ZILLOW, INC., 3:14-cv-04769-RS. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151208b04 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Top Agent Network, Inc. ("TAN") and Defendant Zillow, Inc. ("Zillow"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on September 10, 2015, this Court issued a Scheduling Order which scheduled all discovery and trial deadlines; WHEREAS, this Court's Scheduling Order set the following case deadlines: Item
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES

Plaintiff Top Agent Network, Inc. ("TAN") and Defendant Zillow, Inc. ("Zillow"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 10, 2015, this Court issued a Scheduling Order which scheduled all discovery and trial deadlines;

WHEREAS, this Court's Scheduling Order set the following case deadlines:

Item Deadline Fact Discovery February 5, 2016 Expert Disclosures February 12, 2016 Deadline to Complete Mediation March 8, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures March 11, 2016 Expert Discovery April 15, 2016 Dispositive Motions Hearing July 28, 2016 Final Pretrial Conference October 20, 2016 Jury Trial December 5, 2016

WHEREAS, there have been no previous extensions or requests for extensions of the discovery or trial schedule;

WHEREAS, the parties are actively engaging in the discovery process and will shortly be substantially completing their document production;

WHEREAS, the parties would benefit from a short extension of time to review and analyze the other party's document production, and schedule and prepare for depositions;

WHEREAS, the additional time will also allow the parties to participate in a meaningful mediation in order to potentially resolve this matter;

WHEREAS, the proposed new schedule would not affect the date of the pretrial conference or trial;

WHEREAS, good cause exists to extend the current discovery and case schedule to allow the parties sufficient time to engage in adequate discovery, and engage in a meaningful mediation;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between TAN and Zillow, through their respective counsel of record, that the case deadlines be amended as follows:

Item Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Fact Discovery February 5, 2015 March 29, 2016 Expert Disclosures February 12, 2015 April 12, 2016 Mediation Deadline March 8, 2016 April 29, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures March 11, 2016 May 11, 2016 Expert Discovery April 15, 2016 June 15, 2016 Dispositive Motion Hearing July 28, 2016 August 25, 2016 Final Pretrial Conference October 20, 2016 No change Jury Trial December 5, 2016 No change

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the parties' Stipulation Extending Case Deadlines, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulated request to extend the case deadlines is hereby GRANTED. The case schedule shall be amended as follows:

Item Deadline Fact Discovery March 29, 2016 Expert Disclosures April 12, 2016 Mediation Deadline April 29, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures May 11, 2016 Expert Discovery June 15, 2016 Dispositive Motion Hearing August 25, 2016 Final Pretrial Conference October 20, 2016 Jury Trial December 5, 2016

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer