STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd., ("Plaintiff" or "E & E") and Defendant Light In The Box Limited ("Defendant" or "LITB Limited") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate to a thirteen day extension of Defendant LITB Limited's time to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint from December 15, 2015, to and including December 28, 2015. The Parties' stipulation is based on the following facts:

1. Plaintiff E & E filed a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") in the above captioned case against Defendant LITB Limited on October 14, 2015 (Dkt. No. 60);

2. The Parties conferred and jointly stipulated to enlarge the time for LITB Limited to respond to the SAC to thirty (30) days, to and including November 13, 2015 (Dkt. No. 59);

3. After ongoing settlement discussions, the Parties entered into a joint stipulation and proposed order continuing the Case Management Conference scheduled for December 10, 2015, and extending Defendant LITB Limited's time to respond to the SAC from November 13, 2015 to December 1, 2015 (Dkt. No. 66), which order was entered by the Court on November 16, 2015 (Dkt. No. 67);

4. On November 30, 2015, the Parties again entered a joint stipulation to extend the time for LITB to respond to the SAC from December 1, 2015 to and including December 15, 2015 (Dkt. No. 68), which order was entered by the Court on December 2, 2015 (Dkt. No. 69);

5. The Parties continue to engage in settlement discussions and would like time to continue their settlement talks before taking the time and expense of responding to the SAC;

6. The Parties submit that this agreement was made in the spirit of conserving judicial resources and is in the best interests of the Parties;

7. The agreed upon extension will have no impact on the timing for the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 21, 2016, or any related events;

8. The Parties, therefore, respectfully request that Defendant LITB Limited's time to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the SAC be extended from December 15, 2015, to and including December 28, 2015.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant LITB Limited's time to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint is extended by thirteen days, from December 15, 2015, to and including December 28, 2015.