Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2015
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED RONALD M. WHYTE , Senior District Judge . Having reviewed the Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by Defendant Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case Saratoga Advantage Trust Technology & Communications Portfolio v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., et al., No. 5:15-c
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED RONALD M. WHYTE , Senior District Judge . Having reviewed the Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by Defendant Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case Saratoga Advantage Trust Technology & Communications Portfolio v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., et al., No. 5:15-cv..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
RONALD M. WHYTE, Senior District Judge.
Having reviewed the Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by Defendant Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case Saratoga Advantage Trust Technology & Communications Portfolio v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., et al., No. 5:15-cv-04881-RMW, is deemed related to the cases consolidated under the caption Luna, et al., v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., et al., No. 3:15-cv-05447-JST, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12. Luna, et al., v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., et al., No. 3:15-cv-05447-JST, and consolidated cases shall therefore be reassigned to the Hon. Ronald M. Whyte for all purposes.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(f), the Clerk of the Court is directed to notify the parties and affected judge once the above-mentioned case is formally reassigned to the Hon. Ronald M. Whyte.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
