Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LEWIS v. BAUMARD, 3:14-CV-00471-TEH. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160113d21 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON THE PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS BY BALGUERIE THELTON E. HENDERSON , Senior District Judge . The undersigned, on behalf of their respective clients, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The deadline for filing oppositions to the pending motion by defendant Balguerie to dismiss can be moved from December 7, 2015 to December 14, 2015. 2. The pending deadline to file any reply to said oppositions can be moved from December 14, 2015 to Dec
More

STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES TO MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON THE PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS BY BALGUERIE

The undersigned, on behalf of their respective clients, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The deadline for filing oppositions to the pending motion by defendant Balguerie to dismiss can be moved from December 7, 2015 to December 14, 2015.

2. The pending deadline to file any reply to said oppositions can be moved from December 14, 2015 to December 21, 2015. The parties agree to further meet and confer on the reply deadline if the moving party subsequently believes that it needs additional time to prepare the reply because the moving party is in France.

3. The parties jointly request that the Court modify the briefing schedule for this motion as described.

ORDER

The above stipulation to modify the briefing schedule on the pending motion to dismiss by the Balguerie defendants is approved. Oppositions to the motion are now due on or before December 14, 2015. Any reply to said oppositions is due on or before December 21, 2015. [In addition, the Court makes the further orders stated below:]

• Any party who wishes to file an amended opposition may do so on or before the new December 14, 2015 deadline. • The Court is becoming increasingly concerned about the delays in this case, which was removed nearly two years ago yet remains in the pleadings stage. Counsel are expected to move this case forward expeditiously.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer