Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TAMPOW v. ASTRUE, 1:12-cv-02979-AP. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20130508890 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2013
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Christopher R. Alger McDivitt Law Firm 1401 17 th Street, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 426-4878 calger@mcdivittlaw.com For Defendant: Jessica Milano Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 Seventeenth Street Denver, CO 802
More

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff: Christopher R. Alger McDivitt Law Firm 1401 17th Street, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 426-4878 calger@mcdivittlaw.com For Defendant: Jessica Milano Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 Seventeenth Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-7136 jessica.milano@ssa.gov

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 13, 2012 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 19, 2012 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 17, 2013

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The record is complete and accurate. The parties reserve the right to correct the record in the event it proves to be incomplete.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate the need for additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSESOTHER MATTERS

This case raises no unusual claims or defenses.

7. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 6, 2013 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: April 5, 2013 C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief Due: April 22, 2013

8. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

The parties do not request oral argument.

9. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge.

10. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C. COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer