Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. SHERMAN, 13-cr-00075-WJM. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20130712747 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, Magistrate Judge. This criminal action comes before the Court on the prosecution's Motion for Revocation of Release and for Forfeiture of Bond for Failure to Comply with Pre-Trial Release Conditions, or in the Alternative, for Hearing Addressing Conditions of Release. This motion was heard in court on July 9, 2013. Due to no fault of Defendant, current technology is inadequate to maintain Defendant on electronic monitoring as previously ordered by the Court. Once suit
More

ORDER

MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, Magistrate Judge.

This criminal action comes before the Court on the prosecution's Motion for Revocation of Release and for Forfeiture of Bond for Failure to Comply with Pre-Trial Release Conditions, or in the Alternative, for Hearing Addressing Conditions of Release. This motion was heard in court on July 9, 2013. Due to no fault of Defendant, current technology is inadequate to maintain Defendant on electronic monitoring as previously ordered by the Court. Once suitable arrangements can be made for residence in the city of Salida, Colorado, such monitoring will be possible according to the United States Probation Office. Until that time, Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal, for the reason that, by clear and convincing evidence, no condition or combination of conditions of release currently exists for assuring the safety of the community.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer