Filed: Feb. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2012
Summary: The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 693 , 33 A.3d 282 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, on a CUTPA claim for damages, the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants because the plaintiff `failed to produce an itemization of her claimed CUTPA damages '" PALMER, McLACHLAN and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or deci
Summary: The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 693 , 33 A.3d 282 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, on a CUTPA claim for damages, the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants because the plaintiff `failed to produce an itemization of her claimed CUTPA damages '" PALMER, McLACHLAN and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decis..
More
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 693, 33 A.3d 282 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, on a CUTPA claim for damages, the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants because the plaintiff `failed to produce an itemization of her claimed CUTPA damages?'"
PALMER, McLACHLAN and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
